The book scheduled for our August 17th
discussion is Dreamer by Charles Johnson. It takes place in Chicago during the
summer of 1966 and Dr. Martin Luther King is staying in a disgusting tenement
apartment to underlie the argument for affordable decent housing. Riots are
going on all around and Dr. King is questioning as to whether his position of
non-violence will work in a northern city. The parts of the book that are in
italics are the inner thoughts of Dr. King, the pages in plain type is the
story.
The narrator is Matthew Bishop, a college dropout who
joined the Movement as a record-keeper/note-taker, who says about himself: “I
knew I left no lasting impression people who met me once (and often two and
three times). Most never remembered my name, I had no outstanding features, no “best
side,” as they say, to hold in profile…a shy, bookish man who went to great
lengths not to call unnecessary attention to himself…I was nobody.”
Our discussion wasn’t well attended at all. Judy was
excited about the location of the setting because she had lived in Evanston, IL
and knew all the places described.
Connie C. began by
pointing out how the end of the book tied everything together concerning the
conspiracy by the government to murder Dr. Martin Luther King. She said there’s
a fine line between conspiracy theories and critical thinking.
I wanted to veer the conversation back to the beginning of
the book, where Dr. King first lays eyes on Chaym Smith. I like the way the
scene is set:
Matthew Bishop tells Dr. King, “Reverend, I think you need to take a look at this.
…From my pocket I extracted a dog-eared card…The card I
handed over…was an expired Illinois state driver’s license issued to one Chaym
Smith, birth date 01/15/29, height 5’7”, weight 180, eyes brown. The minister
gazed- and gazed- at the worn license, picking at his lip, and finally looked
back at me, poking the card with his finger.
“This could be me!”
“That’s what we thought too,” I said.
“Who is this man?”
“We don’t know.”
“But what does he want with me?”
“Sir,” I said, “maybe he should tell you himself.”
…He tore his eyes away, then looked back. Smith was still
there…His work shirt was torn in at least two places, and yellowed by his life
in it; his trousers were splotchy with undecipherable stains and threadbare at
the knees-he was the kind of Negro the Movement had for years kept away from
the world’s cameras: sullen, ill-kept, the very embodiment of the blues.”
Chaym Smith was as well-read as Dr. King. He was steeped in
Eastern Religion and had spent one year as a monk in Japan. He’d also taken
classes at the Moody Bible Institute and had started his life wanting to be a
minister. Smith had one bad break after another: didn’t know his father, had
his leg blown up (and his best friend killed in that incident) spent time in a
mental institution, and more, never accomplishing his goals.
Dr. King, on the
other hand, was reared in a middle class family, given every advantage in
Church and school, had parents who nurtured him. The question in the book is
why some people get the upper hand in life and some don’t. One of the recurring
things is the story of Cain and Abel, how Abel’s sacrifice was accepted and
Cain’s wasn’t. Chaym (a variation of the name Cain) says that he’s a type of
Cain, where Dr. King is a type of Abel. Dr. King, in his private musings, even
sees the unfairness of it.
More importantly, Chaym Smith sees Matthew Bishop as a Cain
as well and exhorts him to accept this as a fact of his life and become a
cynic. Matthew Bishop didn’t know his father either. His mother had just recently
died. He seems to be adrift with no identity, pliable to either the goodness of
King or to the cynicism of Smith.
Comments
Post a Comment